Will Canada Pension Plan (CPP) be there when you retire?

Canada Pension Plan (CPP) is one of the pillars of retirement income benefits for Canadians. For the past 20 years since I have been in the financial industry, there has always been a perception that CPP may not be there in retirement.
Is the CPP in crisis?

That’s what we’ve been led to believe for the past 20 years but the hysteria about the CPP s more of a myth than reality. Back in 1996 when there was tremendous fear that a looming pension funding crisis might cause the collapse of CPP. At that time, CPP received $11 billion in contributions but paid out $17 billion in benefits, with an asset base of about $35 billion. Unless something was done, the plan’s collapse would be only a matter of time. The solution was to make some significant increases to the contribution rates and the creation of the CPP investment board to allow funds to be invested into market based securities.

CPP has come a long way since then. Today CPP is in a strong financial position and Canadians should feel good about CPP being there when they retire. Here’s some of my thoughts about why I think CPP will be there in the future.

  • In 2009, the total assets of CPP sits at about $116 billion dollars and is expected to continue to grow from increased contributions and investment income.
  • Back in 2000, The chief actuary of Canada, who reviews the health of the CPP every three years, said in his 2000 report that CPP is sound for at least 75 years. CPP continues to operate on the basis of a 75 year amortization period.
  • The CPP reserve fund is segregated from general government revenue. In other words, CPP is a separate pot of money that belongs to all Canadians that have contributed to CPP. All Fund assets belong to CPP contributors and beneficiaries.
  • CPP is a pay as you go system. Part of the money that is paid into CPP through contributions is used to fund the money leaving CPP for retirement benefits. If there is not enough money to fund the outgoing funds, CPP can simply increase contribution amounts which has been a significant reason for the growth of CPP in the last 10 years.
  • The CPP was reformed in 1997 to stave off a funding crisis. And now, there is a surplus of contributions every year. In other words, there is more money coming into the plan through contributions than money going out as a result of benefits being paid to Canadians.
  • CPP is about to undergo some more significant changes to help preserve the longevity of this key asset. I will discuss some of these proposed changes in a follow up article next week.

Despite the good news, it seems that most Canadians still think CPP may not be there in the future. In fact, public opinion research conducted last month shows that almost two-thirds of Canadians are still unaware that the CPP was successfully reformed 10 years ago.

In terms of your own retirement planning, I think you should incorporate CPP into your plans and assume you will get something. The best way to figure out how much is to simply contact Service Canada to get your CPP statement of contributions.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Related posts:

  1. How much will you get from Canada Pension Plan in Retirement?
  2. Three current debates of Canada Pension Plan
  3. Two conundrums of Canada Pension Plan
  4. Retire Healthy: The importance of good rest
  5. Financial Literacy in Canada
Written by Jim Yih

Jim Yih is a Fee Only Advisor, Best Selling Author, and Financial Speaker on wealth, retirement and personal finance. Currently, Jim specializes in putting Financial Education programs into the workplace. For more information you can follow him on Twitter @JimYih or visit his other websites Group Benefits Online and Advisor Think Box.

8 Responses to Will Canada Pension Plan (CPP) be there when you retire?
  1. Catherine Beck
    May 28, 2011 | 1:23 pm

    Regarding the contribution window for the CPP, is there any recognition yet that this window needs to adapt to the current life-span of Canadians? Will the window be extended to 70 or 71 or older in recognition of the extra 30 years added to our lifespan since WW II?

    I am one of those boomers who plan to keep working until at least my mid-70s. Yet I spent time out of the paying workforce when younger, working F/T as a volunteer in Africa and later getting graduate degrees.

    I look forward to hearing from you on this!

    CB

  2. Cash today
    August 20, 2011 | 4:42 am

    The one should always foresee the future so that planning can be done according to that

  3. Man and Van in London
    October 3, 2011 | 12:42 pm

    Who know what will happen till I retire. I don’t really believe in such plans.

  4. Steve
    December 1, 2011 | 5:10 pm

    The whole system seems like a bit of a ponzi scheme to me. We are forced to pay and the only way we can perpetuate the scheme is for new blood to enter the system and pay increasing percentages. The founders probably saw that the boomer generation was entering the work force and thought they should take advantage. Now it is my generation that will have to pay for the boomers retirement with increased payments. It will then be my children who must pay for my retirement. I think they should fully capitalize the system, and give people an option of participation, or pay out. We should at least be allowed to direct our own accounts if we are inclined to. Otherwise someone is left holding the bag somewhere down the road

    • Jim Yih
      December 1, 2011 | 5:56 pm

      That’s one way to look at it Steve. However, it is important to understand there is a significant surplus in CPP so there is money to sustain payments for quite a while. That being said, the plan requires new money to sustain the long term longevity of the plan. In fact you may not be paying for all the boomers in retirement because of this surplus.

      It would be very difficult for anyone or any organization or any plan to accumulate enough money to sustain lifetime payments without new contributions.

      The problem with giving people the option to opt out is that most people to not have the self-discipline to save money on their own. In my opinion there is a very small segment of the populations who is in a position to take on this huge responsibility on their own.

      I appreciate you sharing your opinions on this matter. More people need to voice their thoughts on this important issue!

      Jim

  5. Aron
    December 22, 2011 | 12:12 pm

    I was married 21 years , worked full time while my then spouse chose
    To stay home and raise our 2 children ,
    She decided after this time she wanted out of the marriage
    Is now. Remarried to someone with an air Canada pension ,
    In Ontario canada she is entitled to 1/2 of my cpp credits.
    How long do I have to work before I can retire with cpp benefits
    And restore max amount of credits .
    Thnx Aron

  6. [...] pays a maximum of $934.17 per month at age 65.  When planning for retirement, I think you can count on getting CPP despite the common fear that it may not be there when you retire.  Although you are likely to get [...]

  7. c cusson
    January 31, 2012 | 3:12 pm

    CPP is not in good form. You stated that it should simply increase payments to it, to provide funds for those drawing from it. This simply increases the debt. Hello that is basic economics. Not a valid arguement.
    CPP/OAS should be indexed based on current retirement income. If someone has a great pension, investment income, they do not need CPP/OAS, save it for those who do need it, vis-a-vis our Canadian Social Contract.
    I personally do not want to see my tax money used by oldies to travel around the world, buy sports cars and move into $300,000 condo’s – which is where I see it spent right now.
    Please do not tell me to put money into RRSPs, as when the mass of baby boomers start to withdraw from their investments instead of adding to it, we will see a huge exodus of investment money and the Investment Sector will deplode, … again…
    Many of my friends lost a huge amount of money before and we’ve learned our lessons.
    We are due to retire in 20 years or so, we don’t have time to invest the majority of our take-home income in RRSPs hoping that it doesn’t become de-valued again when we are out of the workforce.

    Pension Reform NOW!!

    C Cusson
    BA Pol Sci, Economics, Devt Studies
    Business Owner
    owns zero RRSPs invests elsewhere

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.